SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 892

A.R.LAKSHMANAN, GHULAM MOHAMMED
Veeramma – Appellant
Versus
A. P. Pollution Control Board – Respondent


AR. LAKSHMANAN, C. J.

( 1 ) HEARD Shri Satyam Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Bhatt, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Andhra pradesh Pollution Control Board, the first respondent herein, Shri B. V. Rama Mohana rao, learned Counsel for the 6th respondent and the learned Government Pleader for irrigation and Command Area development.

( 2 ) THE petitioners were the owners and possessors of agricultural lands admeasuring Ac. 14. 36 gts. situated in s. No. 172, Ac. 9. 16 gts. in S. No. 17/1 and ac. 9. 27 gts. in S. No. 165 situated at Sangam kalan village, Tandur Mandal, Rangareddy district. Adjacent to the lands of the petitioners, a cement industry by name visaka Cement Industry Ltd. was established which is now taken over by m/s. India Cements Limited, the 6th respondent herein. The petitioners filed the present writ petition for the following reliefs: (A) Declaring the action of the first respondent in not taking any steps to prevent the air pollution caused by the 6th respondent as failure to discharge their legal obligations and consequently direct the first respondent to take such steps as are necessary to stop and contain the blasting and the resultant















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top