SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 809

P.S.NARAYANA
Ibrahim Khan – Appellant
Versus
Gowram Kondaiah – Respondent


P. S. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) THE unsuccessful plaintiffs in OS No. 431 of 1984 on the file of Principal Subordinate Judge, Ranga reddy District are the appellants and the respondents in the appeal are the defendants in the suit. Respondents 32 to 38 were brought on record as legal representatives of deceased 16th respondent and respondents 39 and 40 were brought on record as legal representatives of the deceased respondent 17 and respondents 41 and 42 were brought on record as legal representatives of deceased 23rd respondent, vide Court orders dated 17-3-1992 in CMP No. 11938 of 1990.

( 2 ) THE appellants/plaintiffs instituted the said suit as indigent persons and the appeal also is being prosecuted as indigent persons only.

( 3 ) THE respective pleadings of the parties are as follows:

( 4 ) THE appellants/plaintiffs had prayed for a declaration that they are the owners of the plaint schedule properties and for recovery of possession of the said properties making the following allegations in the plaint.

( 5 ) IT is pleaded in the plaint that the paternal uncle of the plaintiffs Shri Ahmed khan was the owner of the suit lands bearing survey Nos. 1 to 31 (168 to 198), known as hussain Bow






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top