SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 837

A.R.LAKSHMANAN, G.BIKSHAPATHY, GHULAM MOHAMMED
V. Narayana Rao – Appellant
Versus
State OF A. P. , Prohibition and Excise Dept. – Respondent


A. R. LAKSHMANAN, J.

( 1 ) WRIT Petition No. 5387 of 2000 was filed to quash the order of the 2nd respondent dated 22-2-2000 and arising out of the order dated 17-9-1999 in Rc. No. B3/2234/98 passed by the 3rd respondent and to declare them as arbitrary, discriminatory and illegal. Originally the writ petition was filed only to quash the impugned orders dated 22-2-2000 and 17-9-1999. During the pendency of the writ petition the petitioner moved the State government by filing a revision purported to be under Section 64 of the A. P. Excise Act, 1968 (for short the Excise Act ). The said revision petition was dismissed by the government, which is also now impugned in this writ petition by way of amendment.

( 2 ) WRIT Petition No. 6493 of 2000 was filed by East India Transport Agency impleading the State of Andhra Pradesh and five others. The writ petitioner in Writ Petition No. 5387 of 2000 was also impleaded as the 6th respondent as per the court order dated 14-2-2001 in W. P. M. P. No. 3112 of 2001. The said writ petition was filed to quash the order dated 22-2-2000 in so far as it confirms the confiscation of the IML which was seized along with lorries bearing Nos. AP 12t 2921 and








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top