SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 832

ELIPE DHARMA RAO
Ch. Ramakrishna Rao – Appellant
Versus
State OF A. P. , Medical and Health Dept. – Respondent


( 1 ) THE petitioner is a Post-Graduate in general Medicine from Medical College at guntur and he completed the said course in september, 1997 in first attempt. The petitioner completed his MDBS degree also from the same College in the year 1980. It is stated that unlike other examinations, the second respondent-University (NTR university of Health Sciences, at vijayawada) does not grant any percentage of marks in MD and on the other hand, the results were announced on the basis of grading, namely, A, B, C and D. The subjects in MD course are divided into four parts and to get through the examination one has to necessarily secure more than two grades either a or b . If a candidate gets two or more c grades, the candidate is deemed to have been failed in the examination and consequently he/she has to once again appear for the examination. The petitioner secured two a grades and two b grades, whereas third respondent secured b grade in all four parts.

( 2 ) PURSUANT to the notification issued by the second respondent-University for admission into Super Specialty Courses, the petitioner, third respondent and other eligible candidates appeared for the entrance test conducted












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top