SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 879

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, G.ROHINI
P. Purushotham Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Pratap Steels Ltd – Respondent


B. SUDARSHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE defendants in O. S. No. 1159 of 1989 on the lic of the V Additional Judge, City Civil court, Hyderabad are the appellants. The respondent s suit for specific performance has been decreed by the trial Court.

( 2 ) FOR the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred to as plaintiff and defendants throughout this appeal.

( 3 ) ON 31 -10-1987 an agreement for sale was entered into between the defendants and the plaintiff, whereunder they agreed to sell and purchase the house property together with the land admeasuring 4820 sq. metres for a consideration of Rs. 40,25,000. 00 (Forty lakhs twenty five thousan ). In all a sum of Rs. 6 lakhs (six lakhs) has been paid by the plaintiff as and by way of earnest money. The plaintiff agreed to pay a further sum of Rs. 2 lakhs (two lakhs) to the defendants as and by way of further earnest money before 15-12-1987. The balance of sale consideration of Rs. 32,25,000. 00 (thirty two lakhs twenty five thousand) to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendants before the registering Officer at the time of registration of the document.

( 4 ) THE relevant recitals of the agreement, which may have an important bearing











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top