MOTILAL B.NAIK, S.ANANDA REDDY
Zaheer Ahmed Khan – Appellant
Versus
Chief Executive Officer, A. P. State Wakf Board, Hyderabad – Respondent
( 1 ) DURING the course of hearing the writ appeal, on the basis of submissions made by the learned counsel representing the parties, we primarily believed that the writ petition could also be decided along with the writ appeal, so that the issue involved in the writ petition could be set at naught by this Court. Accordingly, we summoned the writ petition to be taken up at 2-15 PM along with the writ appeal and decide the Writ appeal along with the Writ Petition by the following order.
( 2 ) THE Writ Appeal is filed by the petitioner assailing the order passed by the learned single Judge in the above writ petition in WVMP No. 905 of 2002 in WPMP no. 4030 of 2002 dated 20-6-2002.
( 3 ) THE writ petition is filed by the appellant seeking a writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings No. JC/rr/ 2000/b2, dated 12-9-2001 issued by the 1st respondent as illegal, improper, unjust and without jurisdiction and pass such other relief as may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. It is the case of the petitioner that Durgah Koh-e-moula AH, malkajgiri, Ranga Reddy district is a religious Wakf. Some other agricultural lands situated at Malkajgiri and Mallapur a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.