SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 937

DALAVA SUBRAHMANYAM, S.R.NAYAK
T. Saraswathi Prasad Singh – Appellant
Versus
G. V. Kalavathy – Respondent


DALAVA SUBRAMANYAM, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant-5th respondent filed the appeal against the orders passed in E. P. No. l of 2001 dated 9-4-2002 in directing issue of warrant of delivery of possession of E. P. schedule property to the execution petitioner by evicting the judgment-debtors from the E. P. schedule property and also for a direction to grant police aid for execution of the warrant.

( 2 ) THE brief facts leading to the filing ofthe appeal are as follows:the 1st respondent Smt. G. V. Kalavathi filed E. P. No. 1 of 2001 in C. S. No. 14 of 58 under Section 146 and Order XXI Rules 11 and 16 C. P. C. praying to order delivery of possession of E. P. schedule properties to her by evicting the judgment-debtors from E. P. schedule property and for police aid for execution of the warrant.

( 3 ) C. S. NO. 14 of 58 was filed by onedildarunnisa Begum and another for partition of mathruka properties including 14 mulgies as detailed in E. P. schedule. The 1st respondent-petitioner purchased the E. P. schedule premises under registered sale deed dated 12-6-1967 from D-51 and D-52. During the pendency of the suit, there was a compromise between some parties in respect of certain properties and










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top