SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 1032

S.R.NAYAK, DUBAGUNTA SUBRAHMANYAM
A. P. S. R. T. C. rep. by its Depot Manager, palasa Depot, Srikakulam Dist – Appellant
Versus
Mudidina Krishna Moorthy – Respondent


S. R. NAYAK, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal by the management of the a. P. State Road Transport Corporation is directed against the order of the learned single Judge dated 17-8-2000 in Writ Petition no. 21615 of 1996.

( 2 ) THE above writ petition was filed by the first respondent delinquent employee calling in question the award passed by the industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, visakhapatnam dated 18-12-1995 in I. D. No. 148 of 1992.

( 3 ) THE background facts leading to filing of the writ petition are briefly noted as under: While the petitioner was serving as conductor in a casual leave vacancy at palasa Depot of the Road Transport corporation in Srikakulam District, a charge memo containing three charges was issued to him alleging misconduct under the A. P. State Road Transport Corporation (Conduct) Regulations. The first charge being that he failed to observe the mandatory rule of "issue and start"; the second charge that he re-issued nine tickets of Re. 1/- denomination to a batch of nine passengers and the third charge that he closed all denominations in SR, except re. l/- denominations upto stage No. 5. The enquiry officer appointed by the disciplinary authority after conducting en





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top