SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 958

SUBRAHMANYAM
All Nawaz Khan – Appellant
Versus
Farzana Khatoon – Respondent


SUBRAHMANYAM, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application filed under Order I rule 10 C. P. C. , to implead respondents 10 and 11 as respondents 10 and 11 in the appeal and as defendants 9 and 10 in o. S. No. 2020 of 1987 on the file of II Senior civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. Notice of this petition was not taken to respondents 1 to 9 by the petitioners. They have endorsed in the petition that the respondents 1 to 9 are not necessary parties to this petition.

( 2 ) NECESSARY facts for the disposal of this application are as follows: smt. Farhathunnisa Begum was the owner of plaint schedule property. She died on 9-11-1987. The two petitioners are the sons and respondents 1, 2 and 9 are the daughters of the said Farhathunnisa Begum. Petitioners 1 and 2 and 9th respondent together filed the suit in O. S. No. 2020 of 1987 seeking partition and separate possession of their shares in the plaint schedule properties. The two sons claimed 2/7th share each. According to the plaint averments the 9th respondent, who was the second plaintiff in the suit and the other daughters, namely, respondents 1 and 2 herein are each entitled to1/7th share in the plaint schedule properties. Respondents 3 to











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top