SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 1012

V.V.S.RAO
Goldstone Exports Limted, Secunderabad – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. – Respondent


( 79 ) A reading of the above would show that the petitioners have not specified additional assets required and the value offered for each of such items. They only mentioned that any extra assets required will be taken on five years lease at market rate. In contrast, DPML, 4th respondent in their proposal statement at paras 5 and 6 mentioned as under:5. The values that the participant places on the following additional assets as shakarnagar is Rs.- Specify the additional assets required and the value of each asset. The extra land to the extent of 27 acres of factory land within compound wall (the 20 acres land has already been taken into consideration), K-type quarters 7 Nos. Senior Officers bungalows 3 Nos. , Parking yard 3 acres and 2 guntas ETP for sugar and distillery 20 acres 30 guntas, Sugar unit buildings and other civil works, distillery building and other civil works, ETP Bio-earth for distillery 9 acres 25 guntas and Narsapur bore well auxiliary water supply for shakarnagar distillery 8 acres, 31 acres and 32 guntas will be taken for sugar industry at an additional cost subject to fresh valuation by District collector/professional Valuer with mutually agreed price. 6. The

































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top