SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 999

G.BIKSHAPATHY
Agam Shanthamma – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, represented by General Manager, South Central Railway – Respondent


BIKSHAPATHY, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal has been filed by the claimant challenging the order dated 25. 10. 1996 passed in O. A. A. No. 18 of 1996 by the Railway Claims Tribunal, secunderabad Bench at Secunderabad.

( 2 ) A claim was laid by the legal heir of the deceased passenger alleged to have died by accidental fall from train No. 348 while travelling from Zahirabad to Vikarabad. The matter was resisted by the Railways. Basing on the respective pleadings, the Railway Claims Tribunal framed the following issues: (i) Whether the deceased was a bona fide passenger? (ii) Whether the deceased fell down from the train and died as a result of the injuries? (iii) Whether the applicant is a dependant of the deceased? and (iv) To what relief?

( 3 ) THE Railway Claims Tribunal after considering the evidence and the material available on record came to the conclusion that the claimant is the legal heir of the deceased passenger. However, the Railway claims Tribunal held that deceased was not a bona fide passenger on the ground that the railway ticket was not found in his possession. Accordingly, Railway Claims tribunal rejected the claim, against which the present appeal has been filed.

( 4 ) LEAR





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top