SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 1062

G.ROHINI
Isra Fatima – Appellant
Versus
Bismillah Begum – Respondent


G. ROHINI, J.

( 1 ) THIS civil revision petition is directed against the order, dated 10-9-2001 in IA No. 1037 of 2001 in OS No. 451 of 1996 on the file of the Court of the vii Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court. Hyderabad.

( 2 ) THE Plaintiff, who is the petitioner in IA No. 1037 of 2001, is the revision petitioner. His case is that he filed the main suit for injunction in respect of the suit schedule property, and that the same was contested by the defendants, who are the respondents herein. During the course of the evidence of the defendants, 1 st defendant examined herself as DW1, and through him an agreement of sale was marked as Ex. B2. Subsequently, the plaintiff filed IA No. 1037 of 2001 under Section 151 CPC to de-exhibit the document marked as Ex. B2 on the ground that it was not sufficiently stamped. In the affidavit filed in support of the said application, it is stated that the documents in question being an agreement of sale coupled with delivery of possession should be on a stamp paper worth the value of the consideration mentioned in the agreement, and registration of such document is mandatory. It is contended that Ex. B2 was not sufficiently stamped and also not













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top