SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 1081

GHULAM MOHAMMED
Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City – Appellant
Versus
Rachakonda Ranga Subbaiah – Respondent


B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition is filed questioning the order passed by the Andhra Pradesh administrative Tribunal dated 14-12-2001 made in O. A. No. 6799 of 2000 whereunder the Tribunal set aside the departmental proceedings initiated against the respondent herein.

( 2 ) THE respondent herein filed the said Original Application before the Tribunal challenging the departmental enquiry initiated against him in pursuance of the charge Memo No. L and O/b4/1067/98, dated 30-6-1998.

( 3 ) THE case of the respondent-applicant is that the criminal cases registered against him were ended in clean acquittal and as such the departmental enquiry sought to be conducted against him on the same set of facts is not sustainable in law. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-applicant relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court in M. Paul anthony v. Bharat Gold Mines Ltd. , and also the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in A. P. S. R. T. C. and others v. T. Venkatapathi.

( 4 ) THE Tribunal came to the conclusion that the criminal cases, which were registered against the respondent-applicant alone are mentioned as basis for the charge framed against him in





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top