SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 1096

S.R.K.PRASAD
M. Kuppuswami Naidu – Appellant
Versus
V. Chandrasekhar Reddi – Respondent


S. R. K. PRASAD, J.

( 1 ) BOTH the Civil Revision Petitions are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order as they arise out of the same suit. Both the Civil Revision Petitions are directed against the orders dated 10-3-1995 made in I. A. Nos. 366 and 586 of 1990 in o. S. No. 318 of 1989 on the file of the Court of the Additional Subordinate Judge, tirupathi.

( 2 ) THE facts that arise for consideration can be briefly stated as follows; the plaintiff is Srimad Abinava ramanuja Brahmathantra Swathantra prakala Swamiji. He is represented by his power of attorney holder Mr. N. Narasimha reddy. The plaintiff filed the suit seeking division of the plaint schedule land into four equal shares and to allot 1/4th share to the plaintiff and to put him in separate possession of the same. Permanent injunction is also claimed restraining others from changing the physical features of the land. The plaintiff has also claimed some other reliefs. During the pendency of the suit, Srimad Abinava Ramanuja brahmathantra Swathantra Parakala swamiji died on 23-7-1992 and therefore the mutt is succeeded by another Matadhipathi srimad Abhinava Vageesha Brahmathantra swathantra Parakala Sw























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top