SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 1186

D.S.R.VERMA
M. Narasimha Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Begari Samuel – Respondent


D. S. R. VARMA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is filed challenging the order and decree dated 8-11-2001 passed by the court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, hyderabad West and South, Rangareddy district in I. A. No. 2087/2000 in O. S. No. 491/1999. By the impugned order, the court below allowed the application filed by the defendant under Section 5 of the Indian limitation Act and condoned the delay of 260 days in presenting the petition under order 9 Rule 13 C. P. C. to set aside the ex parte decree dated 23-12-1999 passed in o. S. No. 491/1999. Aggrieved by the same, the plaintiffs in the suit filed this revision petition.

( 2 ) FOR the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred to as plaintiffs and defendant.

( 3 ) THE brief facts are that the plaintiffs filed the suit and obtained ex parte decree. Subsequently by order dated 25-2-2000 the court below also gave police protection on an application made by the plaintiffs. Coming to know about the institution of the suit and also the police protection given to the plaintiffs, the defendant averred in the present I. A. that he was not residing at kothwalguda village and shifted to balanagar, due to health problems; that during middl





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top