Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : DALAVA SUBRAHMANYAM, S.R.NAYAK
Government Of A.P., revenue (JA) Department - Appellant
Versus
Chilla Rama Rao - Respondent
W.A.No.1421/2000
Decided On : 10-01-02
Advocates Appeared :
Vedula Venkata Ramana
u/S.19 could go into questions of law and fact as well as propriety and can pass appropriate orders - No provisions of Act or any rule framed thereunder conferring power on Government to condone delay in filing revision under R.4 beyond limitation of 60 days - Procedure adopted by Government in entertaining revision filed by M.R.O completely ignoring more than 9 years delay without notice is quite curious as well as startling - M.R.O is guilty of stating falsehood and misleading quasi-judicial authority of Government - Writ petition is liable to be dismissed.
Limitation - Absolutely no sufficient grounds to condone enormous delay of more than 9 years - State and its authorities cannot be treated on different pedestal than ordinary litigant in matter of condonation of delay - Even where no limitation is prescribed to exercise revisional power, Courts have held that such revisional power should be exercised within a reasonable time - In the instant case it is totally unreasonable to entertain revision filed by M.R.O against orders of Commissioner after lapse of more than 9 years - Also unjustified on part of Government to keep proceedings on its file for large number of years and to dispose of same after lapse of 7 years after filing of revision petition - Exercise of revisional power by State Government is totally unreasonable and arbitrary - Petitioners placed sufficient material before Commissioner and Government to show the title as well as classification of land as non-agricultural land - Government not justified in discrediting entire substantive legal evidence produced by writ petitioners only on basis of entry ‘vacant site’ in post-abolition revenue record - No justification to draw inference that land is Government poramboke simply because is classified as ‘vacant site’ in post-abolition revenue records - Such inference totally unwarranted having regard to registered documents and judgment of civil courts - Order of single Judge in setting aside, order of Government - Justified - Writ appeal dismissed.
( 1 ) THIS Writ Appeal preferred by the government of Andhra Pradesh; the commissioner of Survey, Settlements and land Records; the Collector, Visakhapatnam district and the Mandal Revenue Officer, visakhapatnam, the appellants 1 to 4 respectively, is directed against the judgment and order of the learned single judge dated 29-8-2000 in Writ Petition no. 4174 of 1999. The above writ petition was filed by the respondents herein assailing the validity of the Government order G. O. Ms. No. 793 Revenue (JA) department, dated 13-10-1998. The learned judge by the impugned order has set aside the said order of the Government.
( 2 ) THE dispute arises under the Andhra pradesh (Andhra Area) Estate Abolition and conversion into Ryotwari Act, 1948 (for short the Act ) and relates to grant of ground rent patta in favour of the writ petitioners by the Commissioner of Survey, settlements and Land Records by his order dated 26-5-1982 in respect of an extent of ac. 3. 50 cts. in T. S. No. 52/l-Bl, visakhapatnam Municipality. The said order of the Commissioner was set aside in revisional jurisdiction by the Government vide G. O. Ms. No. 793, dated 13-10-1998 and the said revisional order of the Government was set aside by the learned single Judge.
( 3 ) THE background facts as stated by the writ petitioners leading to the filing of the writ petition be noted briefly as under: The writ petitioners are the descendants of Late nidrabangi Ramaswamy and Chilla ramulu. N. Ramaswamy and Ch. Ramulu purchased Ac. 13. 25 from the land holders of peda Waltair Estates under two instruments dated 12-5-1874 and 28-2-1883. There afterwards, N. Ramaswamy mortgaged a part of his land by registered deed dated 9-7-1919 in favour of one P. Appadu. Similarly, Ch. Ramulu also mortgaged a part of his land by registered mortgage deed dated 13-8-1919 to discharge debts for family necessities. Both of them subsequently sold Ac. 6. 75 in favour of m/s. L. Shahukar and Agarchand under a registered deed dated 2-6-1922. The recitals of these registered documents refer to earlier documents of purchase of land by them. M/s. N. Ramaswamy and Ch. Ramulu also sold land admeasuring Ac. 3. 00 and Ac. 3. 50 in two parcels to several persons for house sites. The purchasers had constructed houses long ago after obtaining necessary permissions and sanctions from the government authorities and concerned local bodies. Sale deed dated 2-6-1922 recites about mutation in town survey records thereby proving identity of the land. Town survey was conducted in 1922 and the land purchased by the ancestors of the petitioners were covered by T. S. No. 52/l-Bl, visakhapatnam and the petitioners have been paying non-agricultural tax on demand to the then Visakhapatnam municipality. Town survey records disclose that the writ petitioners are the original owners. When the matter stood thus, an application was filed by N. Ramaswamy and Ch. Laxma Reddy before the 2nd appellant, the Commissioner of Survey, settlements and Land Records under section 19 of the Act for grant of ground rent patta. The Commissioner granted ground rent patta by his order dated 26-5-1982 in respect of Ac. 3. 5 in T. S. No. 52/l-Bl. Block 4, waltair Wards-2, Visakhapatnam, after hearing the petitioners and the Mandal revenue Officer, Visakhapatnam. A claim for grant of ground rent patta for the same land was also made by one P. Narsingrao reddy and his claim was rejected by the commissioner by his order dated 27-4-1981 for want of evidence to prove the title. Later, the said P. Narsingrao Reddy filed a civil suit O. S. No. 28 of 1979 on the file of the principal Sub-Court, Visakhapatnam for declaration of title against the petitioners and the said suit was dismissed by judgment and decree dated 28-9-1994 holding the writ petitioners are the owners of the land. Later, some other persons connected with the said P. Narsingrao reddy filed W. P. No. 3093 of 1987 questioning the order of the Commissioner granting gro
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.