SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 1351

M.NARAYANA REDDY, R.M.BAPAT
K. Seetharama Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Hassan Ali Khan – Respondent


RAMESH MADHAV BAPAT, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by the defendants 1 and 106 arising out of I. A. No. 926 of 2002 in O. S. No. 38 of 2002, which is pending on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Ranga reddy District at N. T. R. Nagar.

( 2 ) IT appears from the record that the respondents 1 and 2, who were plaintiffs in the suit, had filed the suit for permanent injunction against the defendants-appellants herein and some other respondents herein, which was numbered as O. S. No. 38 of 2002.

( 3 ) THE parties to the appeal are described as arrayed in the original suit.

( 4 ) DURING the pendency of the suit, the plaintiffs filed LA. No. 926 of 2002 under order 39 Rules 1 and 2 C. P. C. with a prayer to grant temporary injunction against the defendants 1 and 106 restraining them from alienating the plaint schedule property to the extent of Ac. 379-10 guntas situated at bachepally village.

( 5 ) THE second plaintiff in her affidavit stated that the suit schedule properties originally belonged to her father late Mohd. Nawaz Jung, who died several years back, survived by her, the 1st plaintiff and other heirs. After the death of her father, one of her step brothers named Mohd. Ha

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top