SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 1342

ELIPE DHARMA RAO
D. Prasada Rao – Appellant
Versus
A. P. State Co-operative bank, Hyderabad – Respondent


ELIPE DHARMA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner herein seeks to declare proceedings No. CDR/231-D/3395 dated 25-1-2002 of the 1st respondent refusing to pay the interest on the delayed payment of gratuity amount payable to the petitioner on 31-3-2000 for the period of delay from 1-4-2000 to 8-10-2001 as illegal and without jurisdiction and consequently to direct the respondents to consider and pay the compound rate of interest at the rate of 18% per annum.

( 2 ) THE case of the petitioner who joined as clerk in the respondents-Cooperative bank is that though he retired on attaining age of superannuation as Assistant general Manager on 31-3-2000, the retirement gratuity payable to him is not paid to him on the ground that a charge memo dated 31-3-2000 was issued. The petitioner challenged the same in w. P. No. 11256 of 2001, which was allowed by this Court on 8-10-2001 following the judgment in W. P. No. 26148 of 2001, dated 25-4-2001 declaring that the respondents have no jurisdiction to continue the disciplinary proceedings after the superannuation and retirement. Thereafter the respondents paid the terminal benefits on 9-10-2001 pursuant to the proceedings dated 6-10-2001. According to







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top