C. Y. SOMAYAJULU, J.

( 1 ) REVISION Petitioner filed O. S. No. 1122 of 2001 for injunction restraining the respondents and their men from interfering with his possession over 230 sq. Yds. in S. No. 296 of Desaipet village, specified in the boundaries mentioned in the Schedule appended to the plaint, which hereinafter would be referred to as "the suit land", and filed IA No. 1372 of 2001 therein seeking an injunction, during the pendency of the suit, restraining the respondents and their men from interfering with his possession over the suit land. The contention of the respondents is that they purchased the suit land and its adjacent land from the revision petitioner and others and that they, but not the revision petitioner, are in possession of the suit land. Exs. P. 1 to p. 4 on behalf of revision petitioner and ex. R. 1 on behalf of respondents were marked during enquiry. Both the Courts below concurrently held that revision petitioner is not entitled to the injunction sought. Hence this revision.

( 2 ) THE contention of Sri J. Nataraja sarma, learned Counsel for the revision petitioner, is that the failure of the Courts below in marking the receipt produced by the revision petiti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document