SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 198

Y.V.NARAYANA
Khader Bee – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Vazir – Respondent


Y. V. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) THE short question that falls for consideration in the present Civil Revision petition is whether the Succession certificate as contemplated under Sec. 214 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 is required for the purpose of executing a decree obtained in the suit for partition of immovable properties.

( 2 ) THE factual matrix in filing the present revision petition is set out hereunder: The petitioners are the plaintiffs. They have filed o. S. No. 243 of 1981 on the file of the learned principal Junior Civil Judge, Karimnagar and obtained a decree. Pursuant to the decree, the petitioners have filed Execution proceedings. Meanwhile one of the decreeholders died. The Executing Court took the stand that in the event of the death of a decreeholder; Succession Certificate is necessary as per Section 214 of the Indian succession Act.

( 3 ) IT is to be noticed that in the present case the decreeholders have filed Execution proceedings pursuant to the decree obtained in the suit for partition and as per section 214 of the Indian Succession Act, succession Certificate is required for the purpose of recovery of any debt. The word debt has been defined under subsection





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top