SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 157

V.V.S.RAO
Sapuram Pedda Rcddenna Chetty – Appellant
Versus
Pottakula Jamru Jan – Respondent


V. V. S. RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE Second Appeal and the Civil revision Petition are filed by one Sapuram pedda Reddenna Chetty. He filed a suit being O. S. No. 132 of 1990 for recovery of an amount of Rs. 10,000. 00 under a pronote executed by one Hussain Saheb. The suit filed against the legal representatives and his elder brother was dismissed by the court of the Additional Subordinate Judge, madanapalli. Aggrieved by the same, he preferred first appeal being A. S. No. 132 of 1990. At that stage, defendants 1 to 4 filed interlocutory application being I. A. No. 755 of 1995 under Order 1 Rule 9 read with order 41 Rule 33 and Sections 144 and 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short "cpc" ). The learned Additional District judge, allowed I. A. No. 755 of 1995 and on that ground dismissed A. S. No. 130 of 1990. Aggrieved by the order dated 27-8-1996 in i. A. No. 755 of 1995, Sapuram Pedda reddenna Chetty (hereinafter called the plaintiff) filed C. R. P. No. 499 of 1997 and aggrieved by the consequential order dated 27-8-1996 in A. S. No. 130 of 1990 dismissing the appeal, the plaintiff filed S. A. No. 30 of 1998. Therefore, both matters are being disposed of by this common order by

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top