V.V.S.RAO
Sapuram Pedda Rcddenna Chetty – Appellant
Versus
Pottakula Jamru Jan – Respondent
( 1 ) THE Second Appeal and the Civil revision Petition are filed by one Sapuram pedda Reddenna Chetty. He filed a suit being O. S. No. 132 of 1990 for recovery of an amount of Rs. 10,000. 00 under a pronote executed by one Hussain Saheb. The suit filed against the legal representatives and his elder brother was dismissed by the court of the Additional Subordinate Judge, madanapalli. Aggrieved by the same, he preferred first appeal being A. S. No. 132 of 1990. At that stage, defendants 1 to 4 filed interlocutory application being I. A. No. 755 of 1995 under Order 1 Rule 9 read with order 41 Rule 33 and Sections 144 and 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short "cpc" ). The learned Additional District judge, allowed I. A. No. 755 of 1995 and on that ground dismissed A. S. No. 130 of 1990. Aggrieved by the order dated 27-8-1996 in i. A. No. 755 of 1995, Sapuram Pedda reddenna Chetty (hereinafter called the plaintiff) filed C. R. P. No. 499 of 1997 and aggrieved by the consequential order dated 27-8-1996 in A. S. No. 130 of 1990 dismissing the appeal, the plaintiff filed S. A. No. 30 of 1998. Therefore, both matters are being disposed of by this common order by
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.