SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 343

D.S.R.VERMA
Kommu China Saidalah – Appellant
Versus
Jallela Gangamma – Respondent


D. S. R. VARMA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is filed against the order dated 9-10-2000 passed by the trial court in LA. No. 614/2000 in O. S. No. 244/1996.

( 2 ) THE petitioners are defendants in the suit. They filed the present LA. under order 8 Rule 6-A of C. P. C. seeking the court to accept the counter-claim of cancellation of registered sale deed no. 3138/1977. The trial Court dismissed the same as not maintainable. Hence the revision. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred to as per the ranking assigned to them in the suit.

( 3 ) THE suit was filed for permanent injunction against the defendnats. The plaint averments are that the plaintiffs are the absolute owners and possessors of the suit land to an extent of Ac. 1-30 guntas each in Sy. No. 384 of Chintapally revenue village; that when the defendants were trying to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of their property the present suit was filed for permanent injunction.

( 4 ) THE boundaries of the suit schedule property as narrated in the plaint is extracted as under:-"east : Tank Bund (kunta katta), west: Land of plaintiffs, north: Hillock and after that, land of pagadala Venkaiah. S














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top