SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 342

D.S.R.VERMA
Avula Sathaiah – Appellant
Versus
Avla Lingaiah – Respondent


D. S. R. VARMA, J.

( 1 ) THE dispute in this revision is whether the unregistered sale deed dated 30-10-1993, sought to be marked can be received and admitted in the evidence.

( 2 ) ORIGINALLY the suit was filed for permanent injunction. During the trial, the defendant No. 1 sought for receipt and admission of an unregistered sale deed dated 30-10-1993 to substantiate the averments made in the written statement. Upon the same being objected by the plaintiff, the trial Court having considered the arguments advanced by both the parties, disallowed the said unregistered sale deed dated 30-10-1993 to be received and admitted into evidence, upholding the objection raised by the plaintiff. Aggrieved by the said finding, the present revision is filed by the defendant No. 3. The parties herein shall be referred to as plaintiff and defendants as per the ranking assigned to them in the suit.

( 3 ) THE plaint averments are necessary to be looked into and they are in brief as follows :-The plaintiff purchased the suit land from defendant No. 3 Avula Sataiah through an agreement of sale dated 22-9-1984 and on the same day paid an amount of Rs. 9,000. 00 as sale consideration to D-3 Sataiah vendo

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top