SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 251

V.V.S.RAO
Koneti Lakshmi Thulasamma – Appellant
Versus
Gangavaram Veera Raghava Reddy – Respondent


V. V. S. RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE defendant is the petitioner herein. The plaintiff- respondent filed the suit being o. S. No. 413 of 1999 on the file of the principal Junior Civil Judge, Cuddapah. The suit is one for eviction and possession. The case of the plaintiff in brief is that he is absolute owner under a registered sale deed dated 18-6-1992, that on the same day the husband of the petitioner was inducted as tenant for running a workshop, that the husband of the defendant closed the workshop in 1994 and left the country and thereafter the defendant is using the demised premises for the purpose other than for which it was let out and that after issuing notice dated 12-5-1999 under Section 106 of the Transfer of property Act, the suit has been filed.

( 2 ) THE petitioner herein has filed written statement denying the plaint allegations and also set up a sale deed dated 28-5-1975 allegedly in favour of the husband of the defendant. She also alleged that the sale deed dated 18-6-1992 is a nominal sale deed in favour of the plaintiff.

( 3 ) THE petitioner filed the present application being I. A. No. 1579 of 2000 under section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (C. P. C. for bre




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top