2001 Supreme(AP) 234
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : S.B.SINHA, S.R.NAYAK
Atkuri Sammaiah - Appellant
Versus
Station House Officer, Kotapally - Respondent
Decided On : 03-08-01
Headnote:
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 341, 302 and 149 - Chennur Police station Act - Sections 25 and 27 - A - P - P - S - Act - Section 8 - House Officer - Protection of Human Rights Act - Section 39 - Petitioner is father of deceased - He alleges that on a Head Constable by name and ten plain clothes policemen of police station carrying weapons came to their house and knocked at door and upon opening door they forcibly entered and picked up deceased and took him with them - Parents deceased went to police station next day morning but his arrest was denied - On a newspapers report arose wherein it was alleged that said to be a deputy member of Peoples War Party was killed in encounter - Petitioner contends that authorities of State had refused to take disciplinary action against persons named hereinbefore nor registered a crime said persons are arrayed as respondents Nos - 6 and 7 along with others - It appears that a magisterial enquiry has been directed in year and therein witnesses were examined - No first information report has admittedly been lodged although more than two years have elapsed - Held, In our opinion in which a direction be issued to Government of State to give sanction and accordingly entrust case to Central Bureau of Investigation and direction is issued to Central Bureau of Investigation through Central Government - Union represented through concerned Secretary in Ministry of Home for registering and investigating case of alleged assault resulting in death - Director General of Central Bureau of Investigation is directed to appoint a team of officers if necessary to investigate case - State Government and Director General of Police Government are directed to fully cooperate with investigation - As regards whether directions issued by National Human Rights Commission which directions are required to be scrupulously followed by State have been followed or not no affidavit affirmed to has been filed by State - In any event Court cannot repose any faith on such magistrates who cannot complete an enquiry in such a sensitive matter for more than two and half years particularly having regard to fact that incident occurred - Order accordingly.
( 1 ) IS writ application shows a sorry state of affairs. It shows how the State in some cases of causing death to the citizens of India in alleged encounters is dealing with the matter.
( 2 ) THE petitioner is the father of the deceased (Atkuri Srinivas ). He alleges that on 3-12-1998 a Head Constable by name Shaik Chand, constable by name Dasarath and ten plain clothes policemen of Kotapalli police station carrying weapons came to their house and knocked at the door and upon opening the door, they forcibly entered and picked up the deceased (Atkuri Srinivas) and took him with them. The parents deceased went to the police station the next day morning but his arrest was denied, On 4-12.-1998 a newspapers report arose wherein it was alleged that the said Atkuri Srinivas said to be a deputy Dalam member of Peoples War Party was killed in encounter. The petitioner contends that the authorities of the State had refused to take disciplinary action against persons named hereinbefore nor registered a crime. The said persons are arrayed as respondents Nos. 6 and 7 along with others. It appears that a magisterial enquiry has been directed in the year 1998 and therein 12 witnesses were examined. No first information report has admittedly been lodged although more than two years have elapsed. Having regard to the aforementioned situation, by an order dated 8-2-2001 this Court directed the Revenue Divisional Officer, Mancherial to personally appear before this Court whereupon Sri B. Anajaih said to be the Revenue Divisional Officer was present before this Court and submitted an affirmed affidavit stating :"the Collector and District Magistrate, Adilabad has appointed the Revenue Divisional Officer and Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Mancherial as Enquiry Officer to conduct magisterial enquiry vide Proc. No. D3/ 1907/98, dt. 30-12-1998 (copy enclosed ). The enquiry is with regard an incident dt. 4-12-1998 at about 0400 hours, in which it has been stated that exchange of fire has taken place between Cennur Dalam (PWG) and Police party at Kambojipet village, resulting in the death of one person by name Atkuri Srinivas alias Ravi, s/o Sammaiah, R/o Mallampet village, Kotapalli. The said order was received by me on 8-1-1999. On receipt of the said order, I have sent intimation to Circle Inspector, Chennur to furnish the following documents. 1. FIR2. Inquest Report
( 3 ) LIST of participants in exchange of fire and list of other witnesses examined by the I. O.
( 4 ) SKETCH of the scene of offence.
( 5 ) COPY of PME. I submit that the same was received by me on 22-7-1999 from the Circle Inspector, Chennur. After receiving the said information, I have Issued a paper publication on 9-11-2000 in Vartha Telugu Daily, district edition, Adilabad Informing the public that the enquiry will be held on 27-11-2000 and whoever is Interested in coming and giving evidence about the cause of death can participate in the enquiry being held by me on 27-11-2000. On 27-11-2000 the complainant, father of the deceased A Sammaiah and mother Sammakka and some villagers in total numbering about 12 have attended the enquiry. Their statements were recorded. One police constable and one SI of Police, Padmanabhya Reddy were examined as far as police personnel are concerned. The enquiry was again held on 18-12-2000. On this day no civilians were present. We could examine only one police personnel, the S. I. of Mancherial who earlier worked at Kotapally a participant in the exchange of fire. "3. Upon that this Court expressed its dissatisfaction as regards the mode and manner of enquiry which is sought to be conducted. On 16-2-2001 an additional affidvit has been filed by the Assistant Superintendent of Police alleging therein: "at the time of the inquest on 4-12-1998, the Executive Magistrate (Mandal Revenue Officer), Chennur recorded the statement of the writ petitioner and in that statement he mentioned that his elder son Atkuri Srinivas was working as a Me