SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 467

B.SUBHASHAN REDDY
Hyderabad Potteries Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector, Hyderabad Dist. – Respondent


B. SUBHASHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner in the instant writ petition prays for issuance of a writ of Mandamus declaring the letter issued by the second respondent-Municipal Corporation of hyderabad vide letter No. 187/tp3/ 2000-441, dated 26-8-2000 as arbitrary and illegal and violative of Section 429 (1) (aa) of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporations act, 1955 and bye-law No. 4 (2) of the building bye-laws. The petitioner consequently prays for issuance of an appropriate direction directing the municipal Corporation of Hyderabad to grant permission as prayed for in building permit File No. 187/tp3/2000.

( 2 ) THE Municipal Corporation of hyderabad (MCH) through the impugned letter rejected the application of the petitioner for the proposed construction of stilt for parking + 5 upper floors for residential apartments consisting of Blocks a to D at premises No. 1-1-365/a, situated at Bakaram, Hyderabad. In the impugned letter, it is stated that the proposals of the petitioner were examined and placed before the Building Committee held on 4-8-2000 and as per the observations of the Building committee, the Joint Collector, Hyderabad has informed that the site under reference is a Gov


































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top