SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 486

B.SUBHASHAN REDDY, T.CH.SURYA RAO
K. Purushotham Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State OF A. P. , Law Dept. – Respondent


T. CH. SURYA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner seeks a Writ of mandamus declaring the Andhra Pradesh state Council of Higher Education Act, 1988 and University Grants Commission instructions, under which the said Act purported to have been passed, as illegal, invalid, void, and ultra vires of the constitution of India.

( 2 ) A resume of the events that led to the passing of the impugned Act is expedient to be set forth for an effective adjudication of the matter hereunder thus:the Central Government evolved a national Education Policy, 1986. The policy, inter alia, recommended that a State Level planning for Co-ordination of the Higher education should be done through Councils of Higher Education. The University Grants commission ( the UGC for brevity) and these Councils would develop co-ordinative methods to keep a watch on the standards of higher education. Since there was no effective machinery for planning and coordination of Higher Education at the State level and the co-ordination of State level programme with those of the UGC, in order to fill up that gap, it was proposed to set up state Councils of Higher Education as statutory bodies.

( 3 ) PURSUANT to the said policy, the UGC

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top