SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 430

V.V.S.RAO, S.B.SINHA
Battu Ratnachander – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. – Respondent


S. B SINHA, J.

( 1 ) THIS wit appeal is directed against a judgment dated 13-3-2001 passed by the learned single Judge in WP no. 2258 of 2001 whereby and whereunder the writ petition filed by the appellant herein was dismissed. The said writ petition was filed seeking inter alia a writ of mandamus declaring the auction notice issued by the third respondent and allotting the mango and cashew yields and seeds to the non-tribal without following the procedure contemplated under the A. P Scheduled Area land Transfers Regulations, 1959 and its amendment 1 of 1970 as illegal contrary to law and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

( 2 ) THE sole question which arises for consideration is as to whether a wide publicity was given in terms of Regulation 4 of A. P. Scheduled Area Land Transfers regulations, 1959 as amended by amendment Act No. 1 of 1970. The fact of the matter is that the third respondent has issued a Notification of auction on 11-1-2001 for the yield of mango and cashew in the schedule area. According to the appellant, he was not aware of the said notification as a result whereof, he could not participate in the auction. The appellant contends that he being










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top