SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 518

Syed Mohd. Ghouse – Appellant
Versus
Noorunnisa Begum – Respondent


T. SURYA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner assails the docket order dated 18-2-2000 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court of Hyderabad. The revision petitioner is the respondent in M. C. No. 13 of 1998 pending on the Family Court, Hyderabad. The respondents 1 and 2 herein are the petiioners in the said M. C. No. 13 of 1998. They filed the petition under Section 125 of the Cr. P. C. seeking maintenance on the premise that the first petitioner married the respondent in the year 1983 as per Muslim Personal Law at Hyderabad, and during their lawful wedlock, the second petitioner-minor was born to them, and that the respondent after the marriage ill treated the first petitioner and harassed her demanding more dowry from her parents and eventually deserted both the petitioners. It is further averred in the petition that the respondent being the Superintendent in Anwar-ul-uloom Boys High School, Nampally, drawing a monthly salary of Rs. 10,000. 00, besides income he is getting from tuitions in an amount of Rs. 4,000. 00 per month and rents from his own house at Rs. 2,000. 00 and thus having had sufficient means, neglected and refused to maintain the petitioners.

( 2 ) THAT petition was resi








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top