( 1 ) THE short question, which arises for consideration in this application, is as to whether violation of the provisions of the bye-law would enable an aggrieved person to avail public law remedy. The petitioner herein was dismissed from service on the ground that he committed the following irregularities: (A) While crediting the loan paid by smt. K. Venka Subbamma to the society account, I had altered the date of payment from 2-10-1999 to 12-10-1999, as if that she discharged the loan on 12-10-1999 even though she paid the loan amount on 2-10-1999. (B) that myself and the Supervisor of the society recommended to grant loan to one Mr. V. Rajeswara Rao and to his brother Kesava Rao even though they are not having any landed property recommended as if they are having lands. (C) that myself and the Supervisor recommended to grant loan to the wife of V. Rajeswara Rao recommending to grant loan showing their fish tanks as wet land in S. No. 274. (D) that myself and the Supervisor who is working along with me in the year 1996 recommended to grant loan to the member of the society of B. Chenchunaidu as if that he is having Ac. 2. 00 land instead of Ac. 0. 45 cents and