SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 629

S.B.SINHA
J. Pushpalatha Devi (died) per L. Rs. – Appellant
Versus
Shyam Sundar – Respondent


S. B. SINHA, J.

( 1 ) ALL these revision petitions being interrelated were taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

( 2 ) LANDLADY is the petitioner in all these revision petitions.

( 3 ) THE brief facts leading to the filing of these petitions may be stated thus: the petitioner is the owner of the premises bearing Municipal No. 6-3-853 situated at Ameerpet, Hyderabad. She had leased four mulgies of the said premises to one Sri Thakur V. Hari Prasad on a monthly rent of Rs. 800. 00, which was enhanced to rs. 1,000/- per month payable in advance every month on or before 5th day. It has been alleged that he stopped paying rent from January, 1987 onwards and committed wilful default in payment of rents for the period from January, 1987 to August, 1987. She further alleged that he had also sublet mulgi No. 3 to one Sri Sharma who had been running Glassware business since october, 1986 and the fourth mulgi to one shri Shyam Sundar who had been running kirana business, without her consent. She also raised the grounds that the premises were being used for the purpose other than for which they were leased, that both the tenant and the sub-tenants have





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top