( 1 ) THESE two appeals have been filed against the judgment and decree passed by learned Single Judge in C. C. C. A. No. 1 of 1992 on 24th June, 1998. The plaintiff has filed L. P. A. No. 166/98 and two of the defendants who were defendants 1 and 2 in the suit have filed L. P. A. No. 226/99. Other defendants have not chosen to file any appeal. Both the appeals were beard together and are being decided by this common judgment.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff filed suit for declaration of title and for recovery of possession of plaint a schedule property. She also sought eviction of defendants from the a schedule property. The plaintiff also sought permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the plaint b schedule property. She also sought recovery of Rs. 6,000. 00 towards the past arrears of damages for use and illegal occupation of plaint a schedule portion, and she also claimed future damages at the rate of Rs. 2,000. 00 per month for use and occupation of plaint a schedule property. The plaintiff s case briefly was that, she was the absolute owner of the house bearing M. No. 21-2-131/7 to 9