V.V.S.RAO, S.B.SINHA
Jalumuru Krushnam Raju – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Tribal Welfare Dept. , A. P. – Respondent
( 1 ) THE Writ Petition and the Writ Appeal are interrelated and therefore it is convenient to dispose of them by this common order. The appellant in the Writ Appeal and the petitioner in the Writ Petition are the same. The parties will be referred to as per their status in the Writ Petition.
( 2 ) THE facts of the case are as follows: the petitioner claims to belong to Scheduled tribe (ST) community. He secured admission during the academic year 1992-93 in first year M. B. B. S as per the Rules and regulations of the University of Health sciences, the fourth respondent. At the time of admission the authorities asked the petitioner to produce community certificate from the first respondent and his admission was kept in abeyance. Therefore the petitioner filed a Writ Petition before this court. The Writ Petition being W. P. No. 9768 of 1993 was allowed by order dt. 4-10-1993 directing the respondents to permit petitioner to attend the classes. This Court further directed the first respondent to complete the enquiry within one month from the date of receipt of the order. In obedience thereto, the petitioner was permitted to attend the classes. However, he was denied
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.