SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 664

V.V.S.RAO
Soorampally Venkata Reddy – Appellant
Versus
New Tirumala Emporium – Respondent


V. V. S. RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition, filed under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for brevity the Code ) raises an interesting question as to whether an order passed under Section 11 (4) of the A. P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) control Act, 1960 (for brevity the Act ) is executable in accordance with Section 15 of the said Act?

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated the facts of the case are as follows: the petitioner is the owner of a non- residential premises in Vizianagaram Town. The same was let out to the respondent on a monthly rent of Rs. 250. 00 in June, 1973, and later the rent was enhanced to rs. 900/ -. The petitioner filed Rent Control case being RCC No. ll of 1999 on the file. of the Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-Rent controller, Vizianagaram, for eviction of the respondent on the grounds of wilful default, bona fide requirement for personal occupation, and on the ground that the respondent used the building for purpose other than for which it was leased. The petitioner also filed an interlocutory application being LA. No. 1389 of 1999 praying to stop all further proceedings in rcc No. ll of 1999, and make an order directing the respondent to vacat















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top