SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 672

B.S.A.SWAMY
Makam Venkatesh – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


B. S. A. SWAMY, J.

( 1 ) AGGRIEVED by the order of the Principal junior Civil Judge, Punganur in LA. No. 1300/2000 in LA. No. 381/1999 in A. S. No. 56 of 1999 refusing to reissue the warrant to locate petition "a" to "d" schedule properties and measure correctly with reference to FMB or village sketch with the assistance of Deputy Inspector of survey, RDO s office, the present revision is filed.

( 2 ) INITIALLY acceding to the request of the petitioner, the Court below appointed an advocate-Commissioner for the parties in la. No. 381/1999 and the Advocate-Commissioner in his report stated that as fmb or village sketch was not provided by the parties, he could not come to the correct conclusion regarding the measurement i. e. , width of the road at point to point. Having come to know about the report, the petitioners filed the LA. No. 1300/2000 seeking re-issuance of the warrant for identification of the properties and measure the land with reference to Field measurement Book with the assistance of deputy Inspector of Survey. The same was dismissed by the Court below by stating: (1) that the petitioners cannot question the orders of the Court issued to Advocate- commissioner; (2) tha




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top