SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 733

S.B.SINHA, V.V.S.RAO
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Vungarala Constructions, Hyd. – Respondent


S. B. SENHA, CJ.

( 1 ) THE question which arises for consideration in these writ petitions is as to whether, in view of the purported no-claim certificate issued by the 1st respondent herein, an application under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1996 Act") was maintainable.

( 2 ) IT is not disputed that the parties hereto entered into an agreement as regards work of diversion of Up line from Channel 169m (km 318/5) to Channel 3318m (Km 321/13) between Bisugirsharrif and potkapalli Station on Kazipet - Balarsha section construction of well foundation and substructure, superstructure with prestressed concrete girders deck slab, etc. , for rebuilding of bridge No. 66 as 27 x 18. 1630 M for Up main line across Manair river including earth work in approach in embankment on either side of the bridge including extension of minor bridge No. 65 and 67".

( 3 ) DISPUTES and differences having arisen between the parties, the same had been referred to a Departmental Committee. Allegedly thereafter the 1st respondent continued with the work and filed a no claim certificate. Despite the same a demand was made for referring the claim t







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top