SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 905

V. Prasada Rao – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


T. SURYA RAO, J.

( 1 ) A short but important question that often crops up for consideration has arisen for determination in this petition. Whether the order of compensation passed by the Court can be stayed pending adjudication of the appeal is the seminal question.

( 2 ) UNDER the impugned order, the learned Sessions Judge suspended the sentence of imprisonment passed in the judgment against the accused on condition of payment of fine and continuance of cash security already furnished. The learned Judge further directed that the order, directing payment of compensation of Rs. 5,60,000/- to be suspended subject to the condition of furnishing third party security. The petitioner is now assailing that part of the order whereunder the Court below directed the petitioner to furnish third party security for suspending the order directing payment of compensation.

( 3 ) COMPENSATION can be ordered to be paid by the Court under S. 357 of the Criminal Procedure Code (for short "the Code" ). For brevity and better understanding of the matter, it is expedient here to extract Sectioin 357 of the Code, in so far as is relevant for the present purposes thus; 357 : Order to pay compensation (1) Wh








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top