SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 819

B.SUBHASHAN REDDY, GHULAM MOHAMMED
M. Manik Reddy – Appellant
Versus
M. Anasuya Devi – Respondent


B. SUBHASHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THESE three Civil Miscellaneous Appeals arise under the Arbitration and Conciliation act, 1996. While C. M. A. Nos. 2671 and 2672 of 2000 are filed against the common order dated 4-8-2000 passed by the Court of iv Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, hyderabad in O. P. Nos. 780 and 781 of 1998, C. M. A. No. 2677 of 2000 is filed against the order dated 4-8-2000 passed in i. A. No. 388 of 2000 in the said O. P. No. 780 of 1998, rejecting the plea of appointment of receiver.

( 2 ) THE parties are closely related and they referred the matter to Arbitrators for entering arbitration and rendering the award. The Arbitration Agreement dated 16-5-1998 was entered into to resolve the disputes pertaining to the joint family properties belonging to the parties and particularly, the 1st petitioner and the 1st respondent as arrayed in O. P. No. 780 of 1998. Two Awards were rendered by the arbitrators on 31-5-1998 and later pn, they issued a clarification dt. 25-6-1998 stating that the Awards dated 31-5-1998 be read as having rendered on 10-6-1998. Aggrieved by said Award, M/s. M. Manik Reddy and m. Vinod Reddy have filed O. P. No. 780 of 1998 to set aside the a



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top