SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 934

B.SUBHASHAN REDDY, S.B.SINHA, S.R.NAYAK
G. V. Ranga Rao – Appellant
Versus
A. P. State Electricity Board Engineers Association – Respondent


S. B. SINHA, C. J.

( 1 ) WHETHER an appeal is maintainable against an order refusing an application for injunction purported to have been filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of civil Procedure read with Section 151 is the question referred to this Bench by a learned single Judge of this Court.

( 2 ) APPELLANTS were the petitioners before the learned Court below. They are working as Divisional Engineers in A. P. TRANSCO.

( 3 ) THEY filed a petition being o. P. No. 1361 of 2000 on the file of the Chief judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad under section 11 of Andhra Pradesh (Telangana area) Public Societies Registration Act, 1350 fasli (for short the Act ) for a declaration that the election scheduled to be held on 9-8-2000 to the 1st respondent-Association is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the procedure contemplated by the 2nd respondent in terms of his notification dated 7-7-2000.

( 4 ) IN the said proceedings, the appellants also filed an interlocutory application being i. A. No. 2109 of 2000 under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of civil Procedure restraining the respondents from conducting the election scheduled to be held on 9-8-2000 to the




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top