SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 797

BILAL NAZKI, ELIPE DHARMA RAO
Velicheti Audinarayana – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, Ministry of Law and Legal Affairs. New Delhi – Respondent


BILAL NAZKI, J.

( 1 ) A revision and a Writ Petition raise same question of law. They have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. It is unfortunate that neither the State Government nor the Union of India filed any counter-affidavit to the writ Petition and the matter had to be heard without a counter on their behalf. The parties shall be referred to as they appear in the cause title of the Writ Petition.

( 2 ) THE petitioners filed O. S. No. 51/75 before Subordinate Judge, Razole seeking a declaration with respect to the title of the plaint schedule property. The suit property was a piece of land measuring Ac. 2-30 cents. Along with the declaration the petitioners sought a decree for possession and mesne profits as well. The suit was decreed on 12-12-77. The respondents 3 to 7 who were defendants in the suit filed an appeal being A. S. No. 115/78 against the judgment and decree. The appellate Court dismissed the appeal, confirmed the judgment of the trial Court on 18-6-86. It is contended in the Writ Petition that in october, 1982 when the Amin went to the suit schedule property for effecting the delivery of possession to the petitioners, some perso








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top