SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 881

S.B.SINHA, V.V.S.RAO
Devarakonda Madhusudhana Rao – Appellant
Versus
B. Madhusudana Rao – Respondent


S. B. SINHA, C. J.

( 1 ) THE Andhra Pradesh State Electricity board is an authority in terms of Article 12 of the Constitution of India. It is expected of a State to see that industrial peace is maintained and inter se dispute amongst the employees is as far as possible avoided. The instant case depicts a sorry state of affairs as to how the Board had been taking different stands at different stages in the matters of administration.

( 2 ) THE appellants were originally the employees in the Sileru Hydro Electric project. A large scale retrenchment of personnel had been effected in the said project. The Board has issued instructions to all the Superintending Engineers including s. E. , Vijayawada Thermal Power Station not to make any recruitments directly under them as the other personnel from the other units like Lower Sileru Hydro Electric project have to be accommodated. The said power Station was treated as a unit by amendment to service regulations in b. P. Ms. /no. ll28 dated 24-10-1989 and the board Memo dated 29-11-1989. The action on the part of the Board was challenged, but the same had been upheld. Negotiations were held between the Union and the Board whereupon an agreeme
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top