SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 857

V.V.S.RAO, GODA RAGHURAM, S.B.SINHA
Gandevalla Jayaram Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Mokkala Padmavathamma – Respondent


S. B. SINHA, C. J.

( 1 ) WHETHER the transfer of immovable property by way of Pasupu Kumkuma (gift of immovable property to a daughter at the time of marriage) requires registration in terms of the provisions of S. 17 of the Registration Act or not is the question involved in this application.

( 2 ) IN Bhubaneswar Naik Santoshrai v. The Special Tahsildar, Land Reforms, Tekkali, AIR 1980 Andh-Pra 139, a Division Bench of this Court held that having regard to the provisions of Section 3 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act which includes the reasonable expenses of marriage of the daughter and further having regard to the nature of the transaction by way of Pasupu Kumkuma which is both involuntary as well as for consideration, such transaction would not attract the provisions of section122 of the Transfer of Property Act and thus, it is not compulsorily registrable in terms of S. 123 thereof. Another learned single Judge of this Court in P. Buchi Reddy v. Anantula Sudhakar (1999) 2 Andhlt 192 followed the decision in Bhubaneswar Naik Santoshrai (supra ).

( 3 ) IN view of the aforementioned decisions, the learned trial Judge held that whatever property is given to a daughter or s







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top