SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 953

B.PRAKASH RAO, R.M.BAPAT
M. Lakshmi Devi – Appellant
Versus
Director General of Police, Hyderabad – Respondent


( 1 ) HIS writ petition is filed by one Smt. Lakshmi Devi wife of M. Venkatramana. The averments made in the writ petition are as under. That the petitioner is the wife of Venkatramana. The petitioner is also related to M. Veeraiah. Both of them are convicts. It is submitted that her husband Venkatramana was firstly remanded on 10-11-1987 in connection with PRC No. 19 of 1988 of Uppal Police Station. He was in jail in connection with this case for three years. Later on he was on bail until 31-3-1993. He was arrested once again and was kept in Nalgonda jail in connection with Sessins Case No. 315 of 1997 which was pending on the file of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Mirayalaguda at Nalgonda District. When he was in Nalgonda jail, the concerend Police have shown him in the year1998 as detenu in connection with PRC No. 19 of 1988 of Uppal Police Station. The Assistant Sessions Judge, Miryalaguda, acquitted the husband of the petitioner in S. C. No. 315 of 1997. Then he was transferred to Chenchalguda jail. After three years of remand he was in jail about two years and 9 months. The total remand period is about five years three months and after conviction in the cases the total period













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top