SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 986

D.S.R.VERMA
Bodaband Sundar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


D. S. R. VARMA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is filed by the State against the order of conviction recorded against the accused for the offence punishable under Section 8 (c) read with Section 20 (b) (i) of Narcotic Drugs and psychotropic Substance Act, 1985, (for brevity herein after referred to as "the Act") and sentencing him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years,

( 2 ) THE case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 6-1-1995 the Excise inspector, Vizianagaram (PW2), Excise sub-Inspector, Gajapathinagaram (PW3) and the Excise Superintendent (PW4) were conducting route watch. When they reached rtc complex at Gajapathinagaram, the accused was coming holding a zip bag (MO3) and one card board (MO1) and upon seeing PWs 2, 3 and 4 the accusd/ appellant herein attempted to run away. PW3 and his staff surrounded the accused, held him and upon questioning by PW3 in Telugu, the accused gave reply in Hindi. Since pw2 was conversant with Hindi, he questioned the accused in Hindi and he gave his name and address. On suspicion pw3 opened MOs. 1 and 3 and found MOs. 2 and 4 respectively which are ganja. PW3 arrested the accused and seized MOs. 1 to 4 and took samples MOs. 5 and 6 from MOs. 2

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top