SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 1032

ELIPE DHARMA RAO
Pinipe Mallamma – Appellant
Versus
Kunche Chinna Mangamma – Respondent


ELIPE DHARMA RAO, J.

( 1 ) BOTH these revision petitions can be disposed of by a common order.

( 2 ) REVISION Petition 1076 of 2000 is directed against the order in IA No. 1049 of 1998 in OS No. 108 of 1986 dated 3-12-1999 on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Rajahmundry wherein the learned Judge dismissed the petition filed under Section 152 CPC to amend item no. 2 of plaint schedule by substituting RS No. 583/2 in the place of RS No. 583/6.

( 3 ) REVISION Petition 1541 of 2000 is directed against the order in IA No. 670 of 1998 in OS No. 108 of 1986 on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Rajahmundry wherein the learned Judge dismissed the petition filed under Section 151 CPC to amend item No. 2 of petition schedule by substituting RS No. 583/2 in the place of RS No. 583/6.

( 4 ) PETITIONERS are the plaintiffs and the respondents are the defendants. Plaintiffs filed a suit in O. S. No. 108 of 1986 against the defendants for cancellation of two settlement deeds dated 16-8-1984 and 16-8-1984 purported to have been executed by late Kollapu Veerayya in favour of the defendants and for partition of the plaint schedule property. Plaint a schedule consists of Ite









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top