( 1 ) THE writ petitioner is the appellant. He is aggrieved by an order dated 15-3-2001 passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition no. 8011 of 1990 whereby, and whereunder the writ petition claiming for the following reliefs was dismissed. "that the Hon ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari and call for the entire records leading to and in r. C. No. A2/740/90 E. O. S. Estt. , dated 23-5-1990 from the file of the Deputy commissioner Endowments Department, kurnool, seeking to appoint Executive officer to the petitioner institution and quash the same as arbitrary, mala fide, illegal, without jurisdiction and unconstitutional and issue any other appropriate writ, order or direction and grant such necessary reliefs. "

( 2 ) MR. M. VIDYASAGAR, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has raised a short question in support of this appeal. Drawing our attention to the finding of the learned single Judge, he would submit that as the Commissioner was the appointing authority so far as the post of executive Officer is concerned, the writ petition ought to have been allowed having regard to the fact that such appointment ha