SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 1202

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Sakala Venkatachalapathy – Appellant
Versus
Madumuru Salamma – Respondent


L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff in O. S. No. 198/80 on the file of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, madanapalle, is the petitioner in this Civil revision Petition. The suit was filed for partition of suit schedule properties and a preliminary decree was passed in the suit. I. A. No. 145/83 was filed for final decree proceedings. It appears that a Commissioner was appointed in the LA. to ascertain the mesne profits as well as the share of the parties to the suit. However, aggrieved by the order passed in IA No. 145/83, defendants 1 to 5 and 14 have filed AS no. 11/84 in the Court of the Additional district Judge, Madanapalle. The said appeal was filed only against the petitioner herein, leaving aside all other parties viz. , defendants 6 to 13 and 15.

( 2 ) ALLEGING that there was non-compliance with the provisions of Order 41 rule 14 CPC in preferring the appeal, in that, the parties to the order under appeal were not arrayed in the Memorandum of Appeal, now the petitioner i. e. , the sole respondent in the appeal filed, IA No. 410/99 praying that the appeal be dismissed for non-joinder of necessary parties. This IA was dismissed by the trial (sic. appellate) Court th





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top