SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 1255

V.V.S.RAO, S.B.SINHA
APSRTC, Mushirabad, Hyd. – Appellant
Versus
State Transport Appellate Tribunal A. P. , Hyd. – Respondent


S. B. SINHA, C. J.

( 1 ) THESE appeals which involve common questions of fact and law were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. They are directed against a common order date 10-6-2001 passed by a learned single judge of this Court in Writ Petition nos. 22056 and 22057 of 1994. FACTS

( 2 ) THE facts in brief are: The appellant - Corporation is third respondent in both the writ petitions. The writ petitions were filed by the third respondent herein to quash the order of the first respondent dated 12-2-1994 whereby and whereunder the order of the second respondent was confirmed.

( 3 ) THE, writ petitioner-third respondent was granted two pucca stage cartage permits on the inter-district route of Anantapur - madanapalli - via - Bathalapally, Kadiri, balasamudram Cross, Molakalacheruvu, somapalem Cross and Bathalapalem Cross extending lover a distance of 117 k. m. He applied for variation in the route. When his application was pending, the appellant- corporation published a draft scheme on 1-11-1974 under Section 68 (c) of the Motor vehicles Act, 1939 ( the Act for brevity) covering the original route. The third respondent was, however, granted variation by


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top