V.V.S.RAO, S.B.SINHA
APSRTC, Mushirabad, Hyd. – Appellant
Versus
State Transport Appellate Tribunal A. P. , Hyd. – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE appeals which involve common questions of fact and law were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. They are directed against a common order date 10-6-2001 passed by a learned single judge of this Court in Writ Petition nos. 22056 and 22057 of 1994. FACTS
( 2 ) THE facts in brief are: The appellant - Corporation is third respondent in both the writ petitions. The writ petitions were filed by the third respondent herein to quash the order of the first respondent dated 12-2-1994 whereby and whereunder the order of the second respondent was confirmed.
( 3 ) THE, writ petitioner-third respondent was granted two pucca stage cartage permits on the inter-district route of Anantapur - madanapalli - via - Bathalapally, Kadiri, balasamudram Cross, Molakalacheruvu, somapalem Cross and Bathalapalem Cross extending lover a distance of 117 k. m. He applied for variation in the route. When his application was pending, the appellant- corporation published a draft scheme on 1-11-1974 under Section 68 (c) of the Motor vehicles Act, 1939 ( the Act for brevity) covering the original route. The third respondent was, however, granted variation by
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.