SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 1283

V.V.S.RAO, BILAL NAZKI, S.B.SINHA
Sri Narsimha Wines – Appellant
Versus
Prohibition and Excise Superintendent, Medak District at Sangareddy – Respondent


S. B. SINHA, C. J.

( 1 ) VIRES of sub-rule (9) of Rule 25 of the andhra Pradesh Indian Liquor and Foreign liquor Rules, 1970 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules ) is in question in this batch of writ petitions. FACTS:

( 2 ) THE petitioners are granted IL 24 licence for retail sale of liquor for the lease year 2000-2001. Allegedly the licence was effective from 17-5-2000 to 31-3-2001. By reason of G. O. Ms. No. 190, Revenue (Ex. III) Department, dated 24-3-1998, sub-rule (9) has been inserted in Rule 25 of the rules which is to the following effect: the annual licence fee for the licences in Form IL 24 referred to in Rule 23 shall be amended from time to time at the rates as shown in the schedule appended to these Rules. The annual licence fee for a lease year shall be paid before the commencement of the lease year to which it relates in one lump-sum or in three equal instalments or in a manner as notified from time to time. Where the licence is issued before the 31st May of the lease year, the first instalment i. e. , l/3rd of the annual licence fee shall be paid into the government Treasury through a. . . . . . . SUBMISSIONS:

( 3 ) THE bone of contention of the learned counsel fo

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top