( 1 ) THE Revision Petitioner is the 1st appellant in R. C. A. No. 16/98 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, ongole and the, 1st respondent in r. C. C. No. 55/95 on the file of Principal junior Civil Judge-cum-Rent Controller, ongole. The 2nd appellant in the appeal and the 2nd respondent in the R. C. C. is the 2nd respondent in the C. R. P. The 1st respondent is the landlord who filed r. C. C. No. 55/95 on the file of Principal junior Civil Judge-cum-Rent Controller, ongole for the relief of eviction on the grounds of wilful default, bona fide personal requirement, sub-letting of the premises and also demolition and reconstruction of the building.

( 2 ) THE parties are referred to hereinafter for the purpose of convenience as arrayed in the R. C. C.

( 3 ) THE landlord-petitioner-1st respondent filed R. C. C. No. 55/95 on the file of Principal junior Civil Judge-cum-Rent Controller, ongole stating that he is the owner of the petition schedule premises and the roof of the building had already collapsed and there is a necessity of demolishing the building and constructing a new structure since the building is of 140 years old and it was further pleaded that